Hegler v. Cannon Mills Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
The question here posed is whether the record permits the inference that Hegler’s death resulted from an injury by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment. If so, the judgment is correct; otherwise, it should be reversed.
That the accident occurred in the course of the employment is conceded, or at least the fact is apparent. Conrad v. Foundry Co., 198 N. C., 723, 153 S. E., 266. That it arose out of the employment is a legitimate inference from the record. Ashley v. Chevrolet Co., 222 N. C., 25, 21 S. E. (2d), 834.
Smith was angered because the deceased criticized his work…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Conrad v. Cook-Lewis Foundry Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Pekin Cooperage Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
- Lockey v. . Cohen, Goldman Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Chambers v. . Oil CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Lassiter v. Carolina Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Rewis v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Withers v. BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Brookhaven Steam Laundry v. WattsMississippi Supreme Court · 1952
- Harrington v. MossDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Tucker v. LowdermilkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.