Legal Opinion

Morrison v. Burlington Industries

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 6, 1981No. 114PublishedCited by 179 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUSKINS, Justice.

The sole question posed by this appeal is as follows: When the Industrial Commission finds as fact, supported by competent evidence, that a claimant is totally incapacitated for work and 55 percent of that incapacity is caused, accelerated or aggravated by an occupational disease and the remaining 45 percent of that incapacity for work was not caused, accelerated or aggravated by an occupational disease, must the Commission, under the Workers’ Compensation Act of North Carolina, award compensation for 55 percent disability or 100 percent disability? Upon such findings of…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Booker v. Duke Medical CenterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Anderson v. LINCOLN CONSTRUCTION COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Anderson v. Northwestern Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Henry v. A. C. Lawrence Leather Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. Conrad v. Cook-Lewis Foundry Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by179 opinions

  1. Rutledge v. Tultex Corp./Kings YarnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Hansel v. Sherman TextilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Hendrix v. Linn-Corriher Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Whitfield v. Laboratory Corp. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  5. Watson v. Winston-Salem Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

174 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API