Moore v. Engineering & Sales Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.
Tbe defendants in tbis ease insist that the facts are not in dispute and, therefore, the findings of the Industrial Commission are propositions of law not conclusive upon the appellate court. There are some stipulations in the record, but we find none covering the vital points of the controversy presented on the appeal. All facts relating to the controversy may be considered disputed until settled by proper authority. The Industrial Commission has been charged with that duty and has been given sole jurisdiction to find the facts upon the evidence, and there is no simpler way to express the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Slade v. Willis Hosiery MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Neely v. City of StatesvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Nissen v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
3Cited by27 opinions
- Harding v. THOMAS AND HOWARD COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Beach v. . McLeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Davis v. Raleigh Rental CenterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Hensley v. Farmers Federation Co-OperativeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Gunter v. Dayco Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.