Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Reamer v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1997No. 1994-2459PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 77 Ohio St.3d 450.] THE STATE EX REL. REAMER, APPELLANT, V. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Reamer v. Indus. Comm.,

1997-Ohio-42.] Workers’ compensation—Denial of wage loss compensation by Industrial Commission not an abuse of discretion when claimant voluntarily removes himself from the full-time labor market and limits himself to part-time work for reasons unrelated to his injury. (No. 94-2459—Submitted November 12, 1996—Decided February 19, 1997.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. v. MorseOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State ex rel. Andersons v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State ex rel. Reamer v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Rizer v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State Ex Rel. Jackson v. Indus. Comm., 08ap-498 (3-10-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. State ex rel. Republic Servs., Inc. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. State ex rel. Roberts v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. State ex rel. Williams-Laker v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API