Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. v. Morse

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1995No. 93-2350PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Per curiam

Both procedural and substantive challenges have been made to the commission’s order. Sustaining these objections in part, we reverse the appellate court’s judgment.

I

Questioning Pepsi’s ability to maintain this cause of action, claimant points out that Pepsi did not appeal the June 14, 1989 order that first awarded wage-loss compensation. Advancing a theory that combines elements of res judicata with failure to exhaust administrative remedies, claimant contends that appellant’s cause of action is barred.

Underlying claimant’s argument is the belief that once eligibility for compensation has…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. B.O.C. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State ex rel. Andersons v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State ex rel. General Refractories Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1989

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pierron v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State ex rel. Ooten v. Siegel Interior Specialists Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State ex rel. Brinkman v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State ex rel. Toth v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State ex rel. Corman v. Allied Holdings, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2012

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API