Legal Opinion
Baloch v. Norton
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 25, 2007No. Civil Action 03-1207 (RMU)PublishedCited by 100 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
Granting the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment; Denying the Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike the Defendant’s Reply
I. INTRODUCTION
New law and new claims return this matter to the court. The plaintiff, Mohammad S. Baloch, brings suit against the defendant, Gale Norton, Secretary of the Department of the Interior, for age discrimination, hostile work environment and retaliation. Compl. ¶ 1. The court previously granted in part the defendant’s first motion for summary judgment-dismissing the plaintiffs claims but permitting him to amend his…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by100 opinions
- Baloch v. KempthorneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Fennell v. AARPDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Bergbauer v. MabusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Dudley v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Dorns v. GeithnerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.