Legal Opinion
Bergbauer v. Mabus
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 27, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2009-1032PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge.
Defendant Secretary of the Navy (“Navy”) renews its Motion [57] for Summary Judgment as to plaintiff Tammy Bergbauer’s claim of hostile work environment based on sexual harassment and retaliation.
Bergbauer sued Navy and Rear Admiral (“RDML”) Charles H. Goddard in June 2009, alleging sexual harassment and hostile work environment claims under Title VII (Counts I and II) and the D.C. Human Rights Act (Counts III and IV), as well as battery against Goddard and intentional infliction of emotional distress against Goddard and Navy. The Court granted…
2Cases cited83 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Craig v. Metropolitan Police DepartmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Warner v. Vance-CooksDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Fields v. VilsackDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Román v. CastroDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Doe v. George Wash. Univ.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.