Legal Opinion

MATTER OF SASSO v. Osgood

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 19, 1995PublishedCited by 400 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Simons, J.

This appeal requires us to interpret the provisions of recently enacted Town Law § 267-b (3) regulating area variances. Specifically, the question is whether the provisions of the statute are exclusive or whether an applicant for an area variance must make a showing of "practical difficulties.” The Appellate Division came to the latter conclusion that, the provisions of the statute notwithstanding, an applicant must show "practical difficulties” before being entitled to an area variance. We disagree, and reverse the order of that Court.

I

In 1989, intervenor Gerald…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Fuhst v. FoleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Matter of Otto v. SteinhilberNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  4. Sega v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Conley v. Town of Brookhaven Zoning Board of AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 1976

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by400 opinions

  1. Ifrah v. UtschigNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Pecoraro v. Board of AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Halperin v. City of New RochelleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. Tall Trees Construction Corp. v. Zoning Board of AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Khan v. Zoning Board of AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 1996

395 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API