Legal Opinion
KRUMMENACHER v. City of Minnetonka
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 24, 2010No. A08-1988PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILDEA, Justice.
This case involves the decision of respondent City of Minnetonka to grant a variance to respondent JoAnne Liebeler so that she could expand her nonconforming garage. Appellant Beat Krummenacher is Liebeler’s neighbor and he challenges the City’s decision. The district court upheld the City’s variance, and the court of appeals affirmed. See Krummenacher v. City of Minnetonka, 768 N.W.2d 377, 384 (Minn.App.2009). Because we conclude that the City applied the wrong standard to Liebeler’s variance request, we reverse and remand to the City for reconsideration under the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Phelps v. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Northwestern College v. City of Arden HillsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Larsen v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Murphy v. Milbank Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. CrawleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- City of Saint Paul v. EldredgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- White v. City of Elk RiverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- State ex rel. Swanson v. 3M Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- J.D. Donovan, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.