Pitco Production Co. v. Chaparral Energy, Inc.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, V.C.J.
¶ 1 The dispositive issue presented on cer-tiorari is whether the terms of a joint operating agreement that designates one party as operator of the unit area and whose language refers to the “operator” in singular form permits the election of more than one unit operator in a Corporation Commission-designated spacing and drilling unit. We answer in the negative. 2
I
ANATOMY OF THE LITIGATION
¶2 Chaparral and Cheyenne (appellants) and Piteo (appellee) are working interest owners in a Corporation Commission-designated drilling and spacing unit. Two wells have been drilled in the unit…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Dodson v. St. Paul Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Hough v. LeonardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Mercury Investment Co. v. F.W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. GuentherSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by94 opinions
- Reeds v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Oklahoma Oncology & Hematology P.C. v. US Oncology, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Aliron International, Inc. v. Cherokee Nation Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- BP America, Inc. v. State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Siloam Springs Hotel, L.L.C. v. Century Sur. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.