Legal Opinion
United States Rubber Co. v. City of Tulsa
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 7, 1924No. 14058PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
PINKHAM, C.
Plaintiff in error, hereinafter termed plaintiff, instituted this action against the city of Tulsa to recover a money judgment.
Plaintiff's petition alleges, in the second paragraph thereof, that the defendant is indebted to it in the sum of $7,426.70, with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent, per annum from January 1, 1921, for goods, wares, and merchandise sold and delivered by plaintiff to the defendant at the special instance and request of the defendant.
It was further alleged that the said purchase had been made according to the laws of the state of Oklahoma,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Whiteside v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Argenti v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Zottman v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- O'Neil Engineering Co. v. Incorporated Town of RyanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- La France Fire Engine Co. v. City of SyracuseNew York Supreme Court · 1900
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Boardman Co. v. Board of Com'rs, Ellis Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Board of County Comr's v. Western Bank & Office Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- State Ex Rel. Russell County v. Fourth National BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
- Town of Red Fork v. Gantt-Baker Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- City of Tulsa v. LangleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.