Legal Opinion
Watson v. American Creosote Works, Inc.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 15, 1938No. 28439PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.
The American Creosote Works, Inc., brought an action against F. E. JVatson to recover a balance on a promissory note dated January 1, 1929, and due March 1, 1929, in the sum of $1,844.22, together with interest and attorney fee.
The defendant answered by general denial, and further alleged that the note was void because at the time it was executed the plaintiff was a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Louisiana and was doing business at the time in the States of Texas and Oklahoma without having obtained a permit to do business in either state. The defendant interposed a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Crosbie v. BrewerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Consolidated Pipe Line Co. v. British American Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Fort Worth Lead & Zinc Co. v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Louthan v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Gunn v. FrybergerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Arthur L. Black v. Baker Oil Tools, Inc., a Division of Baker Hughes, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Gragg v. JamesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
- Meyer v. VanceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Pittsburgh Testing Laboratory, a Corporation v. Farnsworth & Chambers Co., Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
- Neal v. NealCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.