Legal Opinion
In Re Steinberg
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 30, 2004No. 03-BG-801PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
On September 18, 2002, Bar Counsel charged Andrew M. Steinberg, a member of our Bar, with violating the following Rules of Professional Conduct:
Rule 8.4(d), by engaging in conduct that seriously interfered with the administration of justice;
Rule 8.1(b), by failing to respond reasonably to a lawful demand for information from a disciplinary authority, namely, the Office of Bar Counsel; and
Rule XI, § 2(b)(3), by failing to comply with an order of the Board on Professional Responsibility issued in connection with disciplinary proceedings.
On February 25, 2003, following an eviden-tiary hearing,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- In Re DelaneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- In Re SteeleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Matter of ShillaireDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- In Re AbramsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re CaterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SteinbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- In re CooperDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- In Re SteinbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- In re SteinbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.