Legal Opinion
In re Cooper
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 21, 2007No. 06-BG-892PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
The Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”), in accord with the Hearing Committee, has found that respondent, Samuel Cooper, III, violated D.C. Bar R. XI, § 2(b)(3) (failure to comply with court order) and District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct 8.1(b) (failure to respond to Bar Counsel’s lawful demand for information) and 8.4(d) (conduct that seriously interferes with the administration of justice). The Board recommends that respondent be suspended for thirty days, with reinstatement conditioned both on proof of his fitness to resume the practice of law and on his full…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- District of Columbia v. Wical Ltd. PartnershipDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- In Re GreenspanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- In Re LillyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re SteinbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- In Re KitchingsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pietrangelo v. Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr, LLPDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- In re DanielsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2023
- In re DomanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024
- In re JacksonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2023
- In re JenkinsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.