Bridges v. Fisk
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.
In this action against certain stockholders upon their statutory liability, plaintiff seeks to recover from each his or her proportionate share of an alleged indebtedness contracted by the Tefft Motor Car Company, a California corporation. Judgment went for plaintiff and defendant Ida J..Fisk appeals.
The evidence discloses the following: On July 15, 1915, plaintiff and the corporation entered into a written contract—evidenced by the former’s written offer and the latter’s written acceptance—whereby plaintiff agreed to purchase of the corporation a certain automobile for $7,500. The contract…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Hunt v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Thomas v. Pacific Beach Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Castagnino v. BallettaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Mitchell v. BeckmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Philpott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Miller v. McLaglenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Durkin v. DurkinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Smith v. OlsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
- Hooker v. American Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.