Legal Opinion
C.O. Bashaw Co. v. A. U. Pinkham Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 28, 1926No. Docket No. 5063PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.
This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment awarding plaintiff damages in the sum of $731.-50 and costs for an alleged breach of contract for the sale of peanuts.
It appears that on September 7, 1923, C. O. Bashaw Co., the respondent, with offices in San Francisco, agreed to buy from A. U. Pinhham Co., the appellant, which operates in Seattle, 770 bags of Chinese shelled peanuts in bond to be delivered out of a warehouse in Seattle. The sale was negotiated through a brokerage firm in San Francisco named Lilienthal-Williams Co., hereinafter referred to as agents; and it was stipulated during…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jensen v. GossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Condley v. Consolidated Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1921
- Puritas Coffee & Tea Co. v. De MartiniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- M. A. Newmark & Co. v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- Coats & Williamson, Inc. v. Moran & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1924
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gold Mining & Water Co. v. SwinertonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Jozovich v. Central California Berry Growers Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1960
- Alpern v. Mayfair MarketsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Calandro v. KoonsConnecticut Superior Court · 1951
- Gold Mining & Water Co. v. SwinertonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943