Legal Opinion

Minaker v. California Canneries Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1902No. S.F. No. 2297PublishedCited by 9 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, C.

This action was brought to recover $646.90, for fruit sold and delivered by plaintiffs to defendant.

The defendant, in a cross-complaint, set up a claim for damages in the sum of $1,735.64 on account of plaintiffs’ failure to deliver fruit in accordance with their contract. The plaintiffs had judgment for the amount claimed by them, and the defendant appeals from said judgment and from an order denying a new trial.

From the arguments contained in appellant’s brief, we infer that it intends to attack the judgment of the court on the ground that the same is not supported by the findings.

By…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. MacRae v. HeathCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  2. Wood, Curtis & Co. v. SeurichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  3. Loop Building Co. v. DecooCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Fort v. Board of Medical Quality AssuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. Jensen v. GossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API