Legal Opinion

Utzman v. Pennsylvania Rubber Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 24, 1929No. Appeal 9PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

The Workmen’s Compensation Board, overruling the referee, found, in effect, that the claimant, while in the course of his employment, was disabled by an inguinal hernia, suffered as the result of a strain from lifting a heavy body. On appeal, the court of common pleas affirmed the award and entered judgment for the claimant.

At the outset we may say that the board, since the Act of June 26, 1919, P. L. 664, sec. 42'3, has the power to set aside findings of fact of a referee: Vonot v. Hudson Coal Co., 285 Pa. 385; Vorbnoff v. Mesta Machine Co., 286 Pa. 199, 205.

Our…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Vorbnoff v. Mesta Machine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Davis v. DavisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Vonot v. Hudson Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Smith v. Pittsburgh Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Washko v. Ruckno, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Tabuteau v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Mohr v. Desimone SayersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Paul v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. McCoy v. SpriggsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API