Legal Opinion

Paul v. Atlantic Refining Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 13, 1931No. Appeal, 266PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Walling,

This suit by William E. Paul, the original plaintiff, against the Atlantic Refining Company, defendant, for personal injuries, resulted in a verdict and judgment for plaintiff and the defendant has appealed.

The Reading Company’s double track railroad, extending southerly from Williamsport, is crossed at grade by Water Street about a quarter of a mile north of Muncy Station. On the morning of August 24, 1929, as one of defendant’s large motor tank trucks was being driven westerly over the tracks at this crossing, by an employee of defendant, it was struck by the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Vorbnoff v. Mesta Machine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Mudano v. Phila. Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Gail v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. Hollinger v. York Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  5. Davis v. DavisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Littman v. Bell Tel. Co. of Pa.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. King v. Equitable Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Offensend v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Mohr v. Desimone SayersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Dark v. BrinkmanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API