Legal Opinion

Cortez v. Weymouth

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 17, 1965No. Civ. 478PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN (R.M.), J.

— This appeal originated in an action brought by plaintiff Cortez to have a deed declared to be a mortgage, and by plaintiffs Dayoan and Jiminez to cancel deeds conveying their interests in real property; with a cross-action brought by defendants Weymouth and Hunter to quiet title to the subject property.

The gravamen of the plaintiffs’ action is fraud. Upon a non-jury trial there was a plaintiffs’ judgment, and the defendants appeal therefrom.

The three plaintiffs are of Filipino origin and are unable to read or write in the English language.

Defendant Weymouth originally sold…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Seeger v. OdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Berniker v. BernikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Overton v. Vita-Food Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Leeper v. BeltramiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Feckenscher v. GambleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,705 Joel Smolen v. Deloitte, Haskins & SellsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. Hartong v. Partake, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. Wilke v. Coinway, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Radinsky v. T. W. Thomas, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Davis v. KahnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API