Legal Opinion
Wilke v. Coinway, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 19, 1967No. Civ. 23506PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
On this appeal by plaintiffs, Oscar and Kathryn Wilke, from an adverse judgment in their action to rescind for fraudulent representations a contract for the purchase of 30 coin-operated testing devices from defendant, Coinway, Inc., a California corporation (hereafter Coinway), the only question is the sufficiency of the evidence.
The record reveals the following facts. In 1961, plaintiffs, husband and wife, were 68 and 63 years old, respectively, and living in Burlingame. Neither of them had ever had any business experience of any kind. Plaintiff, Oscar Wilke, although employed at that time…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Public Clearing House v. CoyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Harris v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Dyke v. ZaiserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Vogelsang v. WolpertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Blankenheim v. E. F. Hutton & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- State of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Hartong v. Partake, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Merced County Mut. Fire Ins. v. ST. OF CALIFORNIACalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Pacesetter Homes, Inc. v. BrodkinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.