Hartong v. Partake, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
Defendant Partake, Inc. (hereafter Partake) appeals from a judgment in favor of four of the plaintiffs in these consolidated actions for fraud in the inducement in the execution of certain franchise distribution contracts with a purported Partake subsidiary, Pacific Way, Inc. (hereafter Pacific). The questions on appeal are: (1) the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the judgment and findings; (2) Partake’s responsibility for the representations made to plaintiffs on the theory of ostensible authority; (3) the admission of certain evidence concerning the relationship between Partake and…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Teel v. GaskillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of MedicineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Seeger v. OdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Sutter v. General Petroleum Corp.California Supreme Court · 1946
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Stout v. TurneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- OCM Principal Opportunities Fund, L.P. v. CIBC World Markets Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- General American Life Insurance Company v. Lee Castonguay, Jerry Fitzpatrick, Charles Kilmer Alex G. SiebenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Pasadena Medi-Center Associates v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Brandon & Tibbs v. George Kevorkian Accountancy Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1990
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.