Legal Opinion

Hartong v. Partake, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 30, 1968No. Civ. 24127PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

Defendant Partake, Inc. (hereafter Partake) appeals from a judgment in favor of four of the plaintiffs in these consolidated actions for fraud in the inducement in the execution of certain franchise distribution contracts with a purported Partake subsidiary, Pacific Way, Inc. (hereafter Pacific). The questions on appeal are: (1) the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the judgment and findings; (2) Partake’s responsibility for the representations made to plaintiffs on the theory of ostensible authority; (3) the admission of certain evidence concerning the relationship between Partake and…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Teel v. GaskillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of MedicineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Seeger v. OdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Sutter v. General Petroleum Corp.California Supreme Court · 1946

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Stout v. TurneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. OCM Principal Opportunities Fund, L.P. v. CIBC World Markets Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. General American Life Insurance Company v. Lee Castonguay, Jerry Fitzpatrick, Charles Kilmer Alex G. SiebenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  4. Pasadena Medi-Center Associates v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Brandon & Tibbs v. George Kevorkian Accountancy Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1990

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API