Legal Opinion
Alameda National Bank v. Kanchanapoom
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided December 14, 1990No. 90-C-539PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CARRIGAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Alameda National Bank commenced this contract action seeking recovery on promissory notes executed by the defendant Visut Kanchanapoom. Currently pending are: (1) the defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and failure to state a claim, or to transfer this action to California; and (2) the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. Each party has responded by opposing the other’s motion.
The issues have been briefed and oral argument would not materially facilitate the decision process. Jurisdiction exists…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Van Schaack & Co. v. District Court, Eighteenth JDSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
- Ruggieri v. General Well Service, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1982
- Le Manufacture Francaise Des Pneumatiques Michelin v. District Court in & for the County of JeffersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Davis Kidd Booksellers, Inc. v. Day-Impex, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
- Sender v. PowellColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
- Dart International, Inc. v. Interactive Target Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1995
- Plus System, Inc. v. New England Network, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1992
- Rocky Mountain Claim Staking v. FrandsenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.