Legal Opinion
Rocky Mountain Claim Staking v. Frandsen
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided November 7, 1994No. 930349-CAPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JACKSON, Judge:
Plaintiff Rocky Mountain Claim Staking (Rocky Mountain) appeals the trial court’s order granting Defendant William Frand-sen’s Motion to Vacate and Set Aside Plaintiff’s Foreign Judgment. We reverse.
FACTS
In spring of 1991, Frandsen, a Utah resident, telephoned David Waldner, the president of Rocky Mountain, at Rocky Mountain’s offices in Boulder, Colorado. The two parties discussed the staking of Frandsen’s unpatented mining claims in Idaho. Rocky Mountain staked the claims in Idaho, then billed Frandsen in Utah for $8,500. Frand-sen sent an undated check for $8,500 to…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pohl, Inc. of America v. WebelhuthUtah Supreme Court · 2008
- Fenn v. Mleads Enterprises, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2006
- Harnischfeger Engineers, Inc. v. Uniflo Conveyor, Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 1995
- Society of Lloyd's v. ReinhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Keaty v. DodsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.