Davis Kidd Booksellers, Inc. v. Day-Impex, Ltd.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KOCH, Judge.
This interlocutory appeal arises from the First Circuit Court for Davidson County’s assertion of jurisdiction over two non-resident defendants. The trial court, apparently relying on Asahi Metal Indus. Co. v. Superior Court, 480 U.S. 102, 107 S.Ct. 1026, 94 L.Ed.2d 92 (1987), determined that both defendants have sufficient contacts with Tennessee because one of them had entered into an agreement to market the other’s products in the United States. We concur that an interlocutory appeal is warranted in this case, and we also find that further briefing and argument is…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Gordon v. Greenview Hospital, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2009
- Manufacturers Consolidation Service, Inc. v. RodellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
- First Community Bank, N.A. v. First Tennessee Bank, N.A.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2015
- State of Tennessee v. NV Sumatra Tobacco Trading CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
- Susan McKnight, Inc. v. United Industries Corp.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2017
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.