Legal Opinion
Van Schaack & Co. v. District Court, Eighteenth JD
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided July 14, 1975No. 26732PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Pringle
*146This is an original proceeding brought pursuant to C.A.R. 21 in which the petitioner Van Schaack, the defendant and third-party plaintiff below, seeks to prohibit the respondent court from proceeding without also exercising jurisdiction over third-party defendant Highland Park State Bank. The district court of Arapahoe County dismissed petitioner’s third-party complaint and quashed the service of the third-party summons, holding that the court lacked in personam jurisdiction over the third-party defendant. Petitioner sought a writ of prohibition in this court, and we issued a rule to show…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- State Ex Rel. White Lumber Sales, Inc. v. SulmonettiOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- Safari Outfitters, Inc. v. Superior CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
- Dwyer v. District Court, Sixth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
- DEB Adjustment Company v. DillardColorado Court of Appeals · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Behagen v. Amateur Basketball Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Behagen v. Amateur Basketball Association Of The United States Of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Waterval v. District Court in and for El Paso CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
- Brownlow v. AmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Glen E. Leney, Cross-Appellee v. Plum Grove Bank, Cross-Appellant, and Sheldon MossCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.