Legal Opinion

Ness Produce Co. v. Short

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided July 25, 1966No. Civ. 65-405PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before ELY, Circuit Judge, and SOLOMON and TAYLOR, District Judges.

2Per curiam

Plaintiff, Ness Produce Co., filed this action to enjoin defendants from enforcing Chapter 150, Oregon Laws 1965, which requires the labeling of imported meat. Defendants are the officials and agency of the State of Oregon charged with enforcing the statute.

Chapter 150 was enacted on April 7, 1965, and became law on August 13, *5871965. Upon stipulation of the parties, a preliminary injunction was granted, pending our disposition of this case.

Chapter 150 proscribes the wholesale and retail sale of fresh or frozen meat1…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Huron Portland Cement Co. v. City of DetroitSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Swift & Co. v. WickhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Minnesota v. BarberSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by17 opinions

  1. Sohappy v. SmithDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1969
  2. Franssen v. JurasDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1975
  3. Tape Industries Association of America v. YoungerDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1970
  4. American Meat Institute v. BallDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1982
  5. International Packers Limited v. HughesDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1967

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API