Legal Opinion

Swift & Co. v. Wickham

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 22, 1965No. 9PublishedCited by 470 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mb. Justice- Harlan

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Appellants, the Swift and Armour Companies, stuff, freeze, and package turkeys which they ship to retailers throughout the country for ultimate sale to consumers. Each package is labeled with the net weight of the particular bird (including stuffing) in conformity with a governing federal statute, the Poultry Products Inspection Act of 1957, 71 Stat. 441, 21 U. S. C. §§ 451-469 (1964 ed.), and the regulations issued under its authority by the Secretary of Agriculture. 1 Many of these turkeys are sold in New York. Section 193 of New York’s…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  5. Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by470 opinions

  1. Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

465 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API