Legal Opinion
Tape Industries Association of America v. Younger
District Court, C.D. California
Decided July 27, 1970No. Civ. 68-1938PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION, FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
Before TRASK, Circuit Judge, * and WHELAN and HAUK, District Judges. HAUK, District Judge.
This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief. Plaintiffs contend that the so-called “tape piracy” law of California, Penal Code, Section 653h (1968) 1 is in conflict with the Copy right Clause of the United States Constitution, art. I, § 8, cl. 8, 2 and the implementing Federal copyright statutes, 17 U.S.C. §§ 1-215. Plaintiffs seek preliminary and permanent injunctions restraining defendants from initiating or continuing any proceedings to…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- International News Service v. Associated PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Goldstein v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Arista Records, Inc. v. Beker Enterprises, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2003
- Orth-O-Vision, Inc. v. Home Box OfficeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- International Tape Manufacturers Association v. Richard GersteinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Figueroa v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.