Legal Opinion
Huron Portland Cement Co. v. City of Detroit
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 25, 1960No. 86PublishedCited by 614 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stewart
This appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court of Michigan draws in question the constitutional validity of certain provisions of Detroit’s Smoke Abatement Code as applied to ships owned by the appellant and operated in interstate commerce.
*441The appellant is a Michigan corporation, engaged in the manufacture and sale of cement. It maintains a fleet of five vessels which it uses to transport cement from its mill in Alpena, Michigan, to distributing plants located in various states bordering the Great Lakes. Two of the ships, the S. S. Crapo and the S. S. Boardman, are equipped with hand-fired…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Cooley v. Board of Wardens of Port of Philadelphia Ex Rel. Soc. for Relief of Distressed PilotsSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Savage v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Bibb v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Napier v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by614 opinions
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- English v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Arizona v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
609 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.