Legal Opinion

Franssen v. Juras

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided May 5, 1975No. Civ. 73-524PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

This class action challenges the validity of certain rules the State of Oregon has made concerning Medicaid payments to the sick and the old.1 Under their provisions, welfare recipients who are institutionalized in nursing homes are presumed, for purposes of determining the amount they will receive, to have available the income .and resources of their spouses, who are neither institutionalized nor recipients of assistance, regardless of whether such income and resources are in fact available.

Plaintiffs allege that the State’s regulations are invalid under the Supremacy Clause because…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Townsend v. SwankSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Carleson v. RemillardSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Norman v. St. ClairCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  2. Brown v. StantonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
  3. Manfredi v. MaherDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1977
  4. Panthers v. Secretary, Department of Health, Education & WelfareDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1978
  5. Burns v. VowellDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API