In Re Bonds of S. San Joaquin Irrigation Dist.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
This is a proceeding brought to determine the validity of bonds of the South San Joaquin Irrigation District, a proceeding authorized by the Irrigation Act of 1897. (Stats. 1897, p. 254.)
Upon this appeal it is urged:
1. That the law under which the district was created is unconstitutional and void. The contention herein is based on section 1 of the act,—namely, that “A majority in number of the holders of title or evidence of title of lands, . . . such holders of title or evidence of title representing a majority in value of said lands according to the equalized county assessment-roll or rolls…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- People Ex Rel. Chapman v. Sacramento Drainage Dist.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Inglin v. HoppinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Law v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Chinn v. Superior Court of San Joaquin Cty.California Supreme Court · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hopping v. Council of City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- City of Los Angeles v. OliverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Imperial Water Co. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Miller & Lux, Inc. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.