Legal Opinion

Chinn v. Superior Court of San Joaquin Cty.

California Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1909No. S.F. No. 5298PublishedCited by 41 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandate directed to the Superior Court of San Joaquin County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.

This is an original petition for a writ of mandate.

It appears from the petition for the writ that P. E. Lindstrom and others made application to the board of supervisors of San Joaquin County for the formation of an irrigation district in said county to be known as “The South San Joaquin Irrigation District.” The application was made under the provisions of the act of 1897 (Stats. 1897, p. 254, Gen. Laws, p. 501), and such proceedings were had in the matter that on March 22, 1909, an order granting the application for the formation of the district was made by the board, and the objections of…

2Cited by41 opinions

  1. Sacramento Newspaper Guild, Local 92 v. Sacramento County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. Pacific Telephone Etc. Co. v. EshlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Laisne v. California State Board of OptometryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. California Redevelopment Ass'n v. MatosantosCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Tex-Cal Land Management, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API