United Power Ass'n v. Heley
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SAND, Justice.
Defendants appealed from the judgment in an eminent domain action before the Third Judicial District Court, Richland County. As error, defendants asserted the refusal of the district court to allow evidence of consequential damages to their property resulting from the placement of power transmission towers and lines on abutting property.
Raymond and Mary Ann Jelinek [Jeli-neks] and Harvey and Shirley Heley [He-leys] are the appellants in this case and were among a number of Richland County landowners involved in an eminent domain proceeding initiated by United Power Association…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Campbell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Donaldson v. City of BismarckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
- Little v. Burleigh CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
- King v. Stark CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
- United States v. Pope & Talbot, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Johnson v. Monsanto Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- Eck v. City of BismarckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- La Plata Elec. Ass'n, Inc. v. CumminsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Filler v. City of MinotNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- Keller v. Clark Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.