Legal Opinion

Little v. Burleigh County

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1957No. 7569PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRONNA, District Judge.

This is a trial de novo of an action by a landowner against a county upon “implied contract” under Sec. 14 of the North Dakota Constitution which provides that “private property shall not be taken or damaged for public use without just compensation having first been made to, or paid into court for the owner, * *

In 1950, at a purchase price of $399, plaintiff acquired title to a small parcel of pasture land (13.38 acres) through which a county highway had been constructed in 1914. The highway subdivided the parcel into two pieces (11.4 and 1.98 acres). A 6-foot culvert…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. King v. Stark CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Mayer v. Studer & Manion Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Viestenz v. Arthur TownshipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
  4. King v. County of StarkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Carroll v. Township of RyeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Dobler v. MalloyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Eck v. City of BismarckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Huber v. Oliver CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Pauly v. HaasNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
  5. City of Huron v. JelgerhuisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API