Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

King v. Stark County

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1937No. File No. 6440PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action in contract to recover compensation for property claimed to have been taken or damaged by the defendants for public use in the building and improvement of a highway.

The plaintiffs in their complaint allege that they are husband and wife; that the plaintiff Elmer King is the owner of certain lots in the city of Belfield that abut on the section line running north and south along the east boundary of the city; that the plaintiff Anna King is the owner of a quarter section of land lying east of said section line and directly across from the lots owned by Elmer King; that the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Rigney v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Eachus v. Los Angeles Consolidated Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Martin v. TylerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Searle v. City of LeadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Donovan v. AllertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1902

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Smith v. Erie Rd. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Eck v. City of BismarckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Little v. Burleigh CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Winer v. Penny Enterprises, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Krier v. Dell Rapids Twp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API