La Plata Elec. Ass'n, Inc. v. Cummins
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
LOHR, Justice.
The question presented in this case is whether owners of real property who have a portion of their property condemned for the purpose of constructing an electric power line are entitled to compensation for reduction in the value of the remainder of the property resulting from aesthetic damage and loss of view. In La Plata Electric Ass’n, Inc. v. Cummins, 703 P.2d 592 (Colo.App.1985), the Colorado Court of Ap*697peals held that the La Plata County District Court did not err in admitting evidence of loss of aesthetic value and view and approving compensation for damage to the…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Pierpont Inn, Inc. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- City of Denver v. BayerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883
- Troiano v. Colorado Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
- Lavelle v. Town of JulesburgSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
- City of Crookston v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Bly v. StorySupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
- City of Northglenn v. GrynbergSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Fowler Irrevocable Trust 1992-1 v. City of BoulderSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- Jagow v. E-470 Public Highway AuthoritySupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- Central Colorado Water Conservancy District v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.