Eck v. City of Bismarck
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Justice.
Mrs. Enola Eck brought an action for inverse condemnation against the City of Bismarck in the district court. She contended that because the City enacted, and subsequently refused to amend, a zoning ordinance limiting her use of her property to agricultural purposes, the City must pay her the reasonable value of her land. 1
For many years, Mrs. Eck has owned land approximately one mile from Bismarck in Apple Creek Township, Burleigh County, North Dakota. Apple Creek Township zoned the land for agricultural use. In April 1978, exercising extraterritorial zoning powers…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Goldblatt v. Town of HempsteadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Selby Realty Co. v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Rigney v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
- Klopping v. City of WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Livingood v. MeeceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Union State Bank v. WoellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Production Credit Ass'n of Fargo v. IstaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Hager v. City of Devils LakeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Wild Rice River Estates, Inc. v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.