Legal Opinion
Donaldson v. City of Bismarck
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided March 16, 1942No. File 6718, 6719PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChristianson, J.
The plaintiff brought two actions against the defendant for damages alleged to have been sustained by reason of the establishment, maintenance, and operation by the defendant of a public dump near the home owned and occupied by the plaintiff. In one action damages are sought for permanent injuries to the real property, and in the other action damages are sought for the annoyance, inconvenience, and discomfort caused the plaintiff as a result of the establishment, maintenance, and operation of said public dump.
The defendant interposed identical answers in each of the actions.. In such answers…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Jacobs v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Southern Railway Co. v. RouthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. FordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
- Moody v. Village of Saratoga SpringsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- City of Fargo, Cass Cty. v. Harwood TownshipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Kinnischtzke v. City of Glen UllinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
- Menz v. CoyleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
- Eck v. City of BismarckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- Thom v. State Highway CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.