Legal Opinion
Filler v. City of Minot
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 18, 1979No. Civ. 9576PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SAND, Justice.
The plaintiffs (landowners) appealed from a judgment of the district court dismissing their “inverse condemnation” action against the State of North Dakota and the City of Minot (State). The landowners had sought consequential damages for the alleged diminution of the market value of their property arising from the construction of a controlled-access intersection south of Minot. The district court concluded that, as a matter of law, loss' of business, loss of traffic, loss of visibility, and nuisances allegedly suffered by the landowners were *239not compensable, and also that…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- In Re Estate of ElmerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
- Murphy, Inc. v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Hendrickson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Hurley v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
- Acme Theatres, Inc. v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Eck v. City of BismarckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- Regency Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- 8,960 Square Feet, More or Less v. State, Department of Transportation & Public FacilitiesAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- Estate of BartelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Yegen v. City of BismarckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.