Legal Opinion
Patrick M. Figgins v. Noah Wilcox
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 1, 2016No. A14-1358PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, Justice.
Appellant Patrick Figgins brought suit against respondent Grand Rapids State Bank (GRSB) and its CEO, respondent Noah Wilcox, claiming, among other arguments, that Wilcox and GRSB had made misrepresentations and breached an oral agreement regarding the due date of a payment on an outstanding loan. The respondents moved to dismiss on the ground that Minn.Stat. § 513.33 (2014) does not permit these claims. The district court agreed and dismissed the complaint with prejudice. Figgins, on appeal, argues that section 513.33 does not apply to his claims and, to the extent…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Dimond v. ManheimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Application of MinnegascoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- In Re GlaxoSmithKline PlcSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Lietz v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- McGuire v. BowlinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
- Wheeler v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
- Ronning v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
- Buhl v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
- Blanco v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2021
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.