Dimond v. Manheim
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants from a judgment of the district court for St.. Louis county, entered in pursuance of an order for jucement by Moer, J.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
This is an action to have adjudged void certain foreclosure proceedings, which are the basis of defendants’ claim of title to certain real estate,-and to have' it decreed that defendants *179have no title or interest therein. The trial court found as a conclusion of law that the plaintiff was the owner of the land, and that defendants had no title to, interest in, or lien upon it; and the only question presented by this appeal is whether this conclusion of law was justified by the findings of fact.
These findings, so far as here material, are as follows: In October, 1873, the plaintiff, then the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wetzel v. Minnesota Railway Transfer Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
- Bausman v. FaueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Conklin v. WehrmanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Iowa · 1889
3Cited by57 opinions
- Champlin Oil & Refining Company v. ChastainTexas Supreme Court · 1966
- Board of Education of City of Minneapolis v. SandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Dressel v. WeeksAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
- Clark v. DyeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Macomber v. KinneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.