Legal Opinion
Application of Minnegasco
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 3, 1997No. C2-95-876PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KEITH, Chief Justice.
This case requires us to consider the proper practical effect of Minnegasco v. Public Utils. Comm’n, 549 N.W.2d 904, 909-10 (Minn.1996) (“MAC ”), in which we concluded that the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission exceeded its statutory authority in setting natural gas rates. Before MAC was decided, Minnegasco filed this rate case with the Commission in 1993. The Commission issued a final rate order in this case and Minnegasco appealed; however, the appeal was stayed in the court of appeals pending resolution of MAC. In MAC, Minnegasco successfully challenged the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Hoff v. KemptonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- United Gas Improvement Co. v. Callery Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- In Re Senty-HaugenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- In Re Qwest's Wholesale Service Quality StandardsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- In Re HubbardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Szarzynski v. SzarzynskiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- In Re the GUARDIANSHIP OF Jeffers J. TSCHUMY, WardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.