Ronning v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHELLHAS, Judge.
Appellant challenges the district court’s rule 12.02(e) dismissal of his claim for un-derinsured motorist benefits based on his failure, ¡to, first recover from the underin-sured tortfeasor through adjudication or settlement. We affirm. . .
FACTS1
In April 2012, appellant Michael Ron-ning suffered permanent injuries in Iowa *36after a pickup truck in which he was a passenger collided with a vehicle driven by Lawrence Kruger. Respondent State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company insured the truck under a policy that included $1 million in underinsured motorist coverage.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Schmidt v. ClothierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Oanes v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Johnson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Graphic Communications Local 1B Health & Welfare Fund "A" v. CVS Caremark Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Employers Mutual Companies v. NordstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Demitrius Verros v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2025
- Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Company v. OrcuttDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2025
- Katelyn Eikenberry v. American Family Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2023