Legal Opinion

Ronning v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 7, 2016No. A16-0538PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCHELLHAS, Judge.

Appellant challenges the district court’s rule 12.02(e) dismissal of his claim for un-derinsured motorist benefits based on his failure, ¡to, first recover from the underin-sured tortfeasor through adjudication or settlement. We affirm. . .

FACTS1

In April 2012, appellant Michael Ron-ning suffered permanent injuries in Iowa *36after a pickup truck in which he was a passenger collided with a vehicle driven by Lawrence Kruger. Respondent State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company insured the truck under a policy that included $1 million in underinsured motorist coverage.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. ClothierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Oanes v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  3. Johnson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  4. Graphic Communications Local 1B Health & Welfare Fund "A" v. CVS Caremark Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  5. Employers Mutual Companies v. NordstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Demitrius Verros v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2025
  2. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Company v. OrcuttDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2025
  3. Katelyn Eikenberry v. American Family Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API