Wheeler v. State
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
CHUTICH, Justice.
In State v. Johnson , 279 Minn. 209, 156 N.W.2d 218, 223 (1968), we recognized the principle that a district court judge should not "participate in the plea bargaining negotiation itself." The present case requires us to clarify the meaning of "participate" and to determine the appropriate remedy when a defendant proves that the district court participated in the plea bargaining negotiation itself.
The district court in appellant Jetaun Helen Wheeler's case made unsolicited comments about the propriety of the parties' competing settlement offers, including charges and…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Blackledge v. AllisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Marshall v. Jerrico, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. DavilaSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- State v. RaleighSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. HallmarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
- Shelby v. State of MinnesotaDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2020
- State of Minnesota v. Deshon Israel BonnellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2026
- State of Minnesota v. Devin Lee Arola JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2023
- State of Minnesota v. Jaye William SnyderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.