Legal Opinion

Fragoso v. Fell

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 10, 2005No. 2 CA-SA 2005-0001PublishedCited by 94 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PELANDER, Chief Judge.

¶ 1 In this special action proceeding, petitioner Rene Fragoso challenges the respondent judge’s authority to impose a “cash-only” restriction on a pretrial release bond. In an earlier order, we accepted jurisdiction but denied relief, with a decision to follow. This is that decision. We hold that Arizona law, contrary to Fragoso’s argument, does not prohibit a cash-only condition on bail and, therefore, that the respondent judge did not exceed his legal authority in imposing that condition on Fragoso. See Ariz. R.P. Spec. Actions 3(b), 17B A.R.S.

BACKGROUND

¶2…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Zamora v. ReinsteinArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. RiggsArizona Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. FellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  4. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  5. State v. CaseyArizona Supreme Court · 2003

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by94 opinions

  1. Blair v. BurgenerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  2. Manuel M. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  3. Haroutunian v. Valueoptions, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  4. Potter v. VanderpoolCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  5. Karen Fann v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 2021

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API