Potter v. Vanderpool
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KELLY, Judge.
¶ 1 In these consolidated special actions, we are asked to determine whether a superi- or court judge may refuse to appoint at least two mental health experts to assess a criminal defendant’s competency to stand trial, after a court of limited jurisdiction has found, pursuant to Rule 11.2(c), Ariz. R.Crim. P., there are reasonable grounds to conduct a full competency examination. Based on the clear and unambiguous language of Rule 11.2(d), we hold that the superior court does not have the authority to review a lower court’s decision and substitute its own reasonable…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. MoodyArizona Supreme Court · 2004
- Fragoso v. FellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- ChartOne, Inc. v. BerniniCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Devenir Associates v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- Bergeron Ex Rel. Perez v. O'NEILCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Southwest Gas Corp. v. IRWIN EX REL. COUNTYCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- State v. MendozaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- Osterkamp v. BrowningCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- State of Arizona v. Joel Agustin LopezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Cornerstone Hospital of Southeast Arizona v. Ernest H. BlackburnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.