State v. Brooks
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL H. ANDERSON, Justice.
The overriding issue in this case is whether the Minnesota Constitution pro-Mbits monetary bail that can be satisfied only by a cash deposit of the full amount set by the court. Article I, Section 7 of the Minnesota Constitution provides that “[a]ll persons before conviction shall be bailable by sufficient sureties * * * .” Appellant, Wesley Eugene Brooks, asserts that a Scott County District Court order setting “cash only bail” violates this provision of Minnesota’s Constitution. On appeal, the Minnesota Court of Appeals held “cash only” bail constitutional.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Stack v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Matter of BlilieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Matter of SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- State v. RudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Wynkoop v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Fragoso v. FellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- Kahn v. GriffinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. VangSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Smith v. LeisOhio Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.