Legal Opinion

State v. Brooks

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 15, 2000No. C1-98-2388PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAUL H. ANDERSON, Justice.

The overriding issue in this case is whether the Minnesota Constitution pro-Mbits monetary bail that can be satisfied only by a cash deposit of the full amount set by the court. Article I, Section 7 of the Minnesota Constitution provides that “[a]ll persons before conviction shall be bailable by sufficient sureties * * * .” Appellant, Wesley Eugene Brooks, asserts that a Scott County District Court order setting “cash only bail” violates this provision of Minnesota’s Constitution. On appeal, the Minnesota Court of Appeals held “cash only” bail constitutional.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Stack v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Matter of BlilieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  3. Matter of SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  4. State v. RudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Wynkoop v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Fragoso v. FellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  2. Kahn v. GriffinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  3. State v. VangSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  4. Smith v. LeisOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API