Legal Opinion

Blair v. Burgener

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 29, 2010No. 2 CA-CV 2010-0028PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VÁSQUEZ, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 In this breach of contract action, appellants Clifton Burgener; Tigerlilly Investments, LLC; and Bonanza Realty Management, LLC (collectively, Appellants) appeal from the trial court’s denial of their motion to set aside default judgment in favor of appellees, James Blair and Southern Ventures, Inc. (collectively, Blair). Appellants contend the court abused its discretion in permitting alternative means for service of process and, in any event, Blair failed to effect service properly under the terms of the court’s order. For the reasons set forth below, we…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Dusenbery v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Daou v. HarrisArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Fragoso v. FellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  5. General Motors Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Bank of Ny v. DodevCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  2. Duckstein v. WolfCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  3. Champlin Stopinski, Skipton and Assoc. v. Bank of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  4. ADI Global Distribution, a division of Resideo Technologies, Inc. v. GreenDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2021
  5. Aaron L. v. Dcs, S.L.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2019

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API