Legal Opinion

State v. Casey

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 2003No. CR-01-0223-PRPublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Judge.

¶ 1 Fletcher Casey was charged with aggravated assault and claimed he had acted in self-defense. Over objection, the trial judge instructed the jury that the state must prove the elements of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt but that Casey must prove self-defense by a preponderance of the evidence. Casey was convicted and appealed on due process grounds. The court of appeals affirmed the conviction and approved the jury instruction. State v. Casey, No. 1 CA-CR 00-0476, mem. dec. at ¶ 4 (Ct.App. April 12, 2001). We granted review to examine the validity of that…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Martin v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Pool v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. HunterArizona Supreme Court · 1984

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Doe v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Fragoso v. FellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  3. State v. CruzArizona Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. GrellArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State of Arizona v. Jerry Charles HolleArizona Supreme Court · 2016

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API