State v. Casey
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Judge.
¶ 1 Fletcher Casey was charged with aggravated assault and claimed he had acted in self-defense. Over objection, the trial judge instructed the jury that the state must prove the elements of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt but that Casey must prove self-defense by a preponderance of the evidence. Casey was convicted and appealed on due process grounds. The court of appeals affirmed the conviction and approved the jury instruction. State v. Casey, No. 1 CA-CR 00-0476, mem. dec. at ¶ 4 (Ct.App. April 12, 2001). We granted review to examine the validity of that…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Martin v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Pool v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. HunterArizona Supreme Court · 1984
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Doe v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
- Fragoso v. FellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- State v. CruzArizona Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. GrellArizona Supreme Court · 2006
- State of Arizona v. Jerry Charles HolleArizona Supreme Court · 2016
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.